A juror describes the difficulty in reaching a verdict due to contradictions in the witness's statements. Some jurors believed the witness had incredible memory during prosecution, but forgot details during defense, affecting her credibility. The decision was close and not clear-cut, leaving the jury upset but acknowledging they tried hard.
Uh, I think the general consensus is that she, the witness, um, there was a lot of contradictions in her statements. Uh, when it came time for the prosecution, a lot of people felt that she had incredible memory. When it came time to defense, a lot of people felt she forgot a lot of things. Um, and so it kind of spoke a little bit to her credibility. But, um,
You know, it was close. There was It was not, um, you know, clear-cut right down the line. It was just not. Um, so it was a really tough decision. I think in general we feel kind of, you know, upset that we couldn't come up with a verdict. But, uh, we tried. We tried really hard. You don't know.
Um, and we also wanted to believe like, let's let's play with this. Like we do believe her and this did happen. How can we commit like, but not everyone can be convinced enough?